BUSINESS VALUE AS A MANDATORY INDICATOR OF ENTERPRISE PERFORMANCE IN THE CONTEXT OF IMPLEMENTING THE ESG AGENDA

Authors

  • G.S. Merzlikina Volgograd State Technical University
  • N.O. Mogharbel Volgograd State Technical University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25806/uu-5086

Статья поступила в редакцию: 11.03.2025

Статья принята к публикации: 12.03.2025

Статья опубликована: 21.03.2025

Keywords:

ESG agenda, sustainable development, efficiency, business valuation

Abstract

The purpose of this study is defined as a justification of the need, assessment methods, and the possibility of using the business value assessment indicator as an indicator of the enterprise's performance in the context of the ESG agenda. Sustainable development management should be based on environmental, social and management indicators; they are defined, but there is not a single financial indicator of the enterprise's performance among them. However, business is formed and developed on the basis of economic and financial motivation. As a result of the study of scientific publications, it was revealed that many enterprises formally comply with the requirements of sustainable development, in fact, they define the profitability of the enterprise as a general goal, and the discussion of sustainable development is reduced to the study of sustainable financing issues. The authors propose to use the business value indicator as a general integral indicator of the enterprise's performance in the context of the ESG agenda. Over the past thirty years, the science of valuation has been formed in our country, the main theoretical provisions, methodology and assessment procedures have been defined. But the implementation of the ESG agenda requires clarification and the possibility of the methods used and the possibility of assessing the differentiated structural components of the activity (results of environmental, social and management activities). The authors identified problems in implementing the business valuation procedure in the context of the ESG agenda: difficulties in assessing the business value by functional components and for individual business units, short-term forecasts, approximate assessment results and the lack of special sections in the theory and practice of risk assessment for types of activities. According to the authors, these problems can be solved by improving the economic financial accounting system based on digitalization and the use of software products, more active use of the income approach, and the development of the theory and practice of risks.

Информация о публикации

Финансирование: Исследование выполнено без привлечения внешнего финансирования, если иное не указано авторами.

Вклад авторов: Все авторы внесли существенный вклад в подготовку статьи, ознакомились с окончательной версией рукописи и одобрили ее к публикации.

Конфликт интересов: Авторы заявляют об отсутствии конфликта интересов, если иное не указано в публикации.

Правообладатель: Издательский дом «Академический».

Лицензия: Статья распространяется на условиях лицензии Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).

Машиночитаемый файл метаданных: JATS XML

References

Мерзликина Г.С. Устойчивое развитие и ESG-повестка: ключевые проблемы // Вестник АГТУ. Серия: Экономика. 2023. № 3. С. 7-15. DOI: 10.24143/2073-5537-2023-3-7-15.

Qayyum Rajan Green, Blue, Pink and Social Corporate Washing March 29, 2022. [Электронный ресурс]. URL: https://www.esganalytics.io/insights/social-green-blue-pink-washing#toc-how-corporations-are-misleading-esg-investors (дата обращения 12.02.2025).

Сайт rainforest. Alliance. What is the Business Value of Sustainability? [Электронный ресурс]. URL: https://www.rainforest-alliance.org/business/marketing-sustainability/what-is-the-business-value-of-sustainability/ (дата обращения 15.02.2025).

Buchholz H., Eberle T., Klevesath M., Jürgens A., Beal D., Baic A., Radeke J. Forward Thinking for Sustainable Business Value: A New Method for Impact Valuation // Sustainability. 2020. Vol. 12. P. 8420. DOI: 10.3390/su12208420 (дата обращения 10.02.2025).

Krykun V. Sustainable development and ecological responsibility of business // Baltic Journal of Economic Studies. 2016 Vol. 2. № 1. P. 65-70.

L Espahbodi, Reza Espahbodi, Norma Juma, Amy Westbrook, Sustainability priorities, corporate strategy, and investor behavior // Review of Financial Economics, John Wiley & Sons. 2019. Vol. 37 (1). P. 149-167. DOI: 10.1002/rfe.1052.

Pavaloaia, Leontina. Business Valuation in Terms of Indicators of Sustainable Development, CES Working Papers, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iasi, Centre for European Studies, Iasi. 2013. Vol. 5. Is. 1. P. 66-76.

Nekhoda Ye.V., Redchikova N.A., Tyuleneva N.A. Business Models of Companies: From Profit to Sustainable Development and Value Creation September // Upravlenets. 2018. Vol. 9 (4). DOI: 10.29141/2218-5003-2018-9-4-2.

Савченко Ю.Ю. Факторы устойчивого развития в формировании стоимости производственных компаний // Мир новой экономики. 2024. № 18 (1). С. 126-136. DOI: 10.26794/2220-6469-2024-18-1-126-136.

Голова Е.Е., Баетова Д.Р. Оценка стоимости бизнеса в современных условиях // Фундаментальные исследования. 2020. № 4. С. 15-20.

Angelo Riva, Luciano Pilotti. How to measure the Corporate Social Responsibility? // Benchmarking the International Standard and Rating. 2024. DOI: 10.13132/2038-5498/14.4.1075-1105.

Ki-Hoon Lee, Stephan Vachon. Business Value and Sustainability. 2016 DOI: 10.1057/978-1-137-43576-7.

Diez-Cañamero B., Bishara T., Otegi-Olaso J.R., Minguez R., Fernández J.M. Measurement of Corporate Social Responsibility: A Review of Corporate Sustainability Indexes, Rankings and Ratings // Sustainability. 2020. Vol. 12 (5). P. 2153. DOI: 10.3390/su12052153.

Robeco SAM. Measuring Intangibles: Corporate Sustainability Assessment Methodology. 2018. [Электронный ресурс]. URL: https://www.robecosam.com/media/d/0/1/d013178bf9bfae863cbea53a27584ac1_measuring-intangibles-csa-methodology_tcm1011-15705.pdf (дата обращения 12.02.2025).

Fagerström A., Hartwig F., Cunningham G. Accounting and Auditing of Sustainability: Sustainable Indicator Accounting (SIA) // Sustain. J. Rec. 2017. Vol. 10. P. 45-52. DOI: 10.1089/sus.2017.29080.af.

Piero Mella Performance Indicators in Business Value-Creating Organizations. 2000. [Электронный ресурс]. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/242077399_Performance_Indicators_in_Business_Value-Creating_Organizations. DOI: 10.13132/2038-5498/2005.2.25-52.

Sharohina S., Shevchenko Т.А., Alexandrova O.B. Evaluation of Enterprise Activities: The Choice of Indicators. In S.I. Ashmarina, V.V. Mantulenko, M.I. Inozemtsev, E L. Sidorenko (Eds.), Global Challenges and Prospects of The Modern Economic Development, vol. 106. European Proceedings of Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2021. P. 226-232. DOI: 10.15405/epsbs.2021.04.02.28.

Published

2025-03-21

Issue

Section

Economic theory, management and other research