08.00.05 ANALYSIS OF APPROACHES TO ASSESSING THE IMPACTS OF DIGITALIZATION ON PEOPLE’S WELL-BEING
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25806/uu12-12021198-206Статья поступила в редакцию: 02.12.2021
Статья принята к публикации: 08.12.2021
Статья опубликована: 21.12.2021
Keywords:
well-being, quality of life, subjective well-being, digitalization, digital transformation, Digital Quality of Life Index, digitalization index, e-government, digital economyAbstract
The impact of digital transformation on the well-being measurement system has become an independent area of scientific research. Researchers study new socio-economic phenomena caused by digitalization and give both subjected and objective assessment to them. Many aspects of human life are subject to transformation. The dynamics of changes provokes the development of new statistical indicators that can reflect these changes. Thanks to penetration of technology, we face the digital environment more often, which has led to the emergence of the term “digital life”. The task of assessing the quality of digital life arises. Nowadays, indicators of affordability of the Internet, along with its usability, are becoming more important. There is a consensus among researchers on the need to include e-government indicators in well-being metrics. The article describes the essence of the impact of digitalization on people's quality of life, examines the typology of well-being assessment systems, analyzes approaches to quantifying the impacts of digital transformation on the quality of life. The results of the analysis of the digital transformation of various aspects of well-being and the quality of digital life can be used in the compilation of well-founded metrics of well-being. The analysis of the mechanisms for quantifying the impacts of digitalization on well-being will allow the authorities to formulate the principles of forming a policy to improve citizen's quality of life. It should be noted that despite the diversity of approaches, the researchers came to a common conclusion: improving well-being by digitalization will work only in conditions of the development of the institutional environment.
Информация о публикации
Финансирование: Исследование выполнено без привлечения внешнего финансирования, если иное не указано авторами.
Вклад авторов: Все авторы внесли существенный вклад в подготовку статьи, ознакомились с окончательной версией рукописи и одобрили ее к публикации.
Конфликт интересов: Авторы заявляют об отсутствии конфликта интересов, если иное не указано в публикации.
Правообладатель: Издательский дом «Академический».
Лицензия: Статья распространяется на условиях лицензии Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
Машиночитаемый файл метаданных: JATS XML
References
Korovkin V. The Digital Life of Russian Regions 2020: What Defines the Digital Divide? Institute for Emerging Markets Research, SKOLKOVO Business School (IEMS). 2020. [Электронный ресурс]. URL: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3622418 (дата обращения: 20.11.2021).
Digital Economy Report 2021 Cross-border data flows and development: For whom the data flow. USA, New York: United Nations Publications. 2021. 238 p.
OECD, Measuring the Digital Transformation: A Roadmap for the Future, OECD Publishing, Paris, 2019. [Электронный ресурс]. URL: https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264311992-en (дата обращения: 20.11.2021).
Hatem L., Ker D. Going Digital Toolkit. 2021. No 6. [Электронный ресурс]. URL: Measuring well-being in the digital age. goingdigital.oecd.org/data/notes/No6_ToolkitNote_MeasuringWellbeing.pdf (дата обращения: 20.11.2021).
OECD, How's Life? Measuring Well-being, OECD Publishing, Paris, 2020. DOI: 10.1787/9870c393-en.
OECD. How's Life in the Digital Age? Opportunities and Risks of the Digital Transformation for People's Well-being, OECD Publishing, Paris, 2019. DOI: 10.1787/9789264311800-en.
The Global Information Technology Report 2012: Living in a Hyperconnected World, World Economic Forum and INSEAD, 2012. 441 p.
eGovernment Benchmark 2021 Background Report: Entering a New Digital Government Era. doi: Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2021. DOI: 10.2759/798973.
Об утверждении государственной программы Российской Федерации «Информационное общество»: постановление Правительства РФ от 15.04.2014 № 313: ред. от 09.11.2021. [Электронный ресурс]. URL: https://www.consultant.ru/cons/cgi/online.cgi?req=doc&base=LAW&n=400351 (дата обращения: 20.11.2021).
Измерение благополучия в эпоху цифрового общества: последствия для официальной статистики // Шестьдесят восьмая пленарная сессия Конференции европейских статистиков. Европейская экономическая комиссия ООН. 2020, 20 с. [Электронный ресурс]. URL: unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/stats/documents/ece/ces/2020/ECE_CES_2020_20-2005802R.pdf (дата обращения: 20.11.2021).
Katz R.L. et al. Measuring digitization: A growth and welfare multiplier. Technovation. 2013. Vol. 33. P. 314–319.
Зверева А.А., Беляева Ж.С., Сохаг К. Влияние цифровизации экономики на благосостояние в развитых и развивающихся странах // Экономика региона. 2019. Т. 15. вып. 4. С. 1050-1062. DOI: 10.17059/2019-4-7.
Welby B. The impact of digital government on citizen well-being, OECD Working Papers on Public Governance, No. 32, OECD Publishing, Paris, 2019. DOI: 10.1787/24bac82f-en.
Angela C. Lyons, Josephine Kass-Hanna. A human development approach to measuring and improving the digital livelihoods of vulnerable populations. The G20 Insights Platform. 2020. [Электронный ресурс]. URL: g20-insights.org/policy_briefs/a-human-development-approach-to-measuring-and-improving-the-digital-livelihoods-of-vulnerable-populations-2 (дата обращения: 20.11.2021).
Пахомов Е.В. Концепция системы показателей оценки уровня и качества жизни населения в условиях цифровой экономики // Экономика: вчера, сегодня, завтра. 2020. Т. 10. № 12А. С. 233-250. DOI: 10.34670/AR.2020.23.41.075.
